COVID concerns climb to their highest levels since April
Pardon the Interruption
This article is just an example of the content available to mallowstreet members.
On average over 150 pieces of new content are published from across the industry per month on mallowstreet. Members get access to the latest developments, industry views and a range of in-depth research.
All the content on mallowstreet is accredited for CPD by the PMI and is available to trustees for free.
Our COVID-19 concern indices are rising, bringing family, professional and personal concerns to levels not seen since early April. Many in our research panel report that despite being fully jabbed, they remain fearful the vaccine will prove ineffective against newer variants. Another factor driving concerns is the loss of confidence in the government, which several panel members criticise for being reckless in its rush to loosen restrictions.
Growing scepticism over Westminster’s pandemic guidance
Over a third of our research panel are ‘very’ or ‘extremely’ worried about the government’s handling of the pandemic and nearly half are ‘somewhat’ worried. Most of the frustration is over the government’s strategy for loosening COVID restrictions, which many contend is both confusing and unscientific. Another criticism is that Whitehall has failed to account for an inevitable wave of infection rates once restrictions are removed on July 19th. Relaxing restrictions too soon could force us into another lockdown, which would ultimately harm the economy’s ability to recover, with many businesses closing their doors again, they fear.
Public safety paramount in social engagements
Many parts of the globe have failed to keep pace with the UK’s vaccination campaign, but panel members are worried that newer variants may prove resilient against the current batches of the vaccine. Despite such risks, UK residents returning from amber list countries will no longer be required to self-isolate and get tested, as long as they have been fully jabbed with an NHS-approved vaccine.
Our panel thinks this is prompting a blasé attitude about public safety and urges others to remain vigilant by limiting their interactions to small gatherings with loved ones. They also suggest that we should practice patience and not return to face-to-face meetings, in-person events or working from the office until at least September; and that it would be more sensible to forego international travel plans until next year.
Schemes predict long lasting macro consequences from the pandemic
Global macroeconomic challenges are compounded by heavy borrowing to help individuals and businesses stay afloat during the pandemic, our panel members say. They are also concerned that the pandemic will force lawmakers into a ‘no-win’ scenario where they must either risk a dramatic spike in inflation by continuing to prop up furlough schemes or accept higher rates of unemployment by removing these schemes. Many also wrongly expect this outbreak to suddenly go away, so governments and the public at large must come to terms with the reality that COVID is likely to become endemic. The panel expects the macro consequences of this new reality to last well into 2023.
What are the consequences of the government’s reopening plans, and how do you feel about the threat of new variants? Click hereto tell us in our bi-weekly survey.
Previous articles in this series:
05/05: COVID concern indices dip to all-time lows as most covenants are left unchanged by the pandemic
About the COVID Concern Index
This short survey helps gauge sentiment of our community on the pandemic. The results are distributed via the community newsletter. Until 31/08/2020, this was a weekly survey. From 01/09/2020, the survey shifted to a bi-weekly cadence.
The COVID Concern Index values should be used as indication only and do not constitute advice. Their values are bound by the choices available in the survey on which they are based.
COVID Concern Index:
- 0 = respondents are not worried at all
- 100 = respondents are extremely worried
Expected minimum duration of outbreak:
A methodology change took place on 06/10/2020, affecting data from 20/10/2020 onwards.
Prior to 06/10/2020:
- Lowest possible value = 1 month
- Highest possible value = 6 months
Following 20/10/2020:
- Lowest possible value = 1 month
- Highest possible value = 12 months
Expected minimum duration of macro effects:
A methodology change took place on 15/04/2020, affecting data from 21/04/2020 onwards.
Prior to 15/04/2020:
- Lowest possible value = 3 months
- Highest possible value = 12 months
Following 15/04/2020:
- Lowest possible value = 3 months
- Highest possible value = 60 months
Macro rates index:
- -100 = all respondents think rates will fall
- 0 = all respondents think rates will stay the same
- +100 = all respondents think rates will rise
Sector sentiment index:
-100 = all respondents think the sector will be a ‘loser’ in the pandemic
0 = all respondents see a neutral outlook for the sector
+100 = all respondents think the sector will be a ‘winner’ in the pandemic
Concerned about the coronavirus outbreak and its macro implications? Click here to take part in the bi-weekly COVID-19 survey.