Professional COVID concern spikes by 18% as trustees brace for a longer lockdown
Pardon the Interruption
This article is just an example of the content available to mallowstreet members.
On average over 150 pieces of new content are published from across the industry per month on mallowstreet. Members get access to the latest developments, industry views and a range of in-depth research.
All the content on mallowstreet is accredited for CPD by the PMI and is available to trustees for free.
The economic impact of the pandemic is now as much a personal as a professional issue, given the absence of a clear strategy on how or when to resume business activity. With even long-term jobs at risk, there are concerns that furloughed staff will have no jobs to return to.
No cure in sight makes trustees revise expectations
Reporting more deaths and close ones at risk, the respondents in our weekly survey see the coronavirus as increasingly unavoidable, with some saying they are “waiting to get it” and glad they took out life insurance as it is now “only a matter of time”.
While data about the spread of COVID-19 is showing signs of improvement, there is no doubt that protective measures must end at the right time and in an appropriate way. Trustees are bracing for a longer lockdown – the outbreak is expected to last nearly four more months, in addition to the month already gone by.
We need a cure, but it is a long way away, with Gilead's antiviral drug just one of those not successful enough in clinical trials. In the meantime, behavioural changes are becoming more embedded: people are shunning gatherings and outings for online-based activities done from home and shifting spending from luxuries to necessities.
Economic consequences will persist into the second half of 2022
The expected duration of macro effects has increased by over three months, exceeding two years for the first time (although we only allowed this as an option in the previous survey iteration). So it is no longer a question of whether there will be a recession, or whether the global economy will change – the debate now is about what shape they will both take.
While some pension schemes are starting to see opportunities to undo funding level damage caused by lockdown-related volatility, others are only just starting to acknowledge the full impact on technical provisions. And while the optimists expect the economy to change permanently for the better through a greater focus on resilience and sustainability, the drop-off in activity will be hard to make up.
It is still difficult to imagine the path to normality, or what the ‘new normal’ will look like, but we do know we will have new risks to deal with, be it greater austerity or rising interest rates after the unprecedented increase in public debt we have seen in recent weeks.
How much longer do you think the outbreak would last? Are you more or less worried about the economic impact? Click here to take next week’s survey.
Previous articles in this series:
- 21/04: Macro effects of COVID to last until 2022, with personal concerns up by 10%
- 14/04: COVID concerns fluctuate – there is no path to normalisation in sight
- 07/04: Although personal concerns subside, the magnitude of COVID’s economic impact remains unclear
- 31/03: COVID Concern Index subsides – have UK pensions schemes settled into the ‘new normal’?
- 24/03: mallowstreet Flash Insights: Rising levels of concern about COVID and a changing economy
- 23/03: mallowstreet Insights: Asset managers have shared their views on the economic impact of COVID-19, but what do pension funds think?
- 19/03: COVID-19: Government response divides pensions community
- 18/03: 96% of pension funds and trustees preparing for a long-term COVID-19 fallout
- 18/03: mallowstreet Flash Insights Report: COVID-19 – what’s on trustees’ minds
About the COVID Concern Index
This short weekly survey helps gauge sentiment of our community on the pandemic. The results are distributed each week via the community newsletter.
The COVID Concern Index values should be used as indication only and do not constitute advice. Their values are bound by the choices available in the survey on which they are based.
COVID Concern Index:
- 0 = respondents are not worried at all
- 100 = respondents are extremely worried
Expected minimum duration of outbreak:
- Lowest possible value = 1 month
- Highest possible value = 6 months
Expected minimum duration of macro effects:
A methodology change took place on 15/04/2020, affecting data from 21/04/2020 onwards.
Prior to 15/04/2020:
- Lowest possible value = 3 months
- Highest possible value = 12 months
Following 15/04/2020:
- Lowest possible value = 3 months
- Highest possible value = 60 months
Concerned about the coronavirus outbreak and its macro implications? Click here to take part in the weekly COVID-19 survey.